Shared AI Prompts: Copy, Adapt & Share

View this page in

Practical prompts you can copy, adapt, and reuse. Open a title to read the prompt here. Replace the bracketed details with your own situation.

5 prompts

No.	Category	Title	Author	Date
5	Work	Email replies and follow-ups EMAIL GOAL Write an email to: [RECIPIENT / ROLE]. The purpose is: [WHAT I NEED TO ACHIEVE]. CONTEXT Relevant background: [PASTE THE SITUATION, PRIOR EMAIL, DEADLINE, OR AGREEMENT]. Relationship with recipient: [CLIENT / MANAGER / COWORKER / VENDOR / FRIEND / OTHER]. TONE Use a tone that is: [PROFESSIONAL / WARM / DIRECT / DIPLOMATIC / FRIENDLY / FIRM]. Avoid: [TOO APOLOGETIC / TOO FORMAL / PRESSURE / JARGON / EMOTIONAL LANGUAGE]. MUST INCLUDE – [FACT / DATE / REQUEST / DEADLINE] – [FACT / DATE / REQUEST / DEADLINE] MUST NOT INVENT Do not invent names, dates, promises, prices, policies, previous conversations, attachments, or commitments that I did not provide. CALL TO ACTION I want the recipient to: [REPLY / CONFIRM / APPROVE / SEND / SCHEDULE / PAY / REVIEW]. OUTPUT Give me: 1. A clear subject line. 2. The email body. 3. A shorter version if the first draft is over 150 words. 4. Flag any missing factual detail I should confirm before sending. Read the guide	Praclane	2026-10-04
4	Research	Research with sources and verification RESEARCH GOAL Research this question: [QUESTION OR DECISION]. CONTEXT Use this context: [LOCATION, DATE RANGE, AUDIENCE, BUDGET, CONSTRAINTS, DEFINITIONS, OR BACKGROUND]. SEARCH STRATEGY 1. Determine what information must be current and search the web for those parts before answering. 2. Prefer official, primary, or first-party sources for rules, product features, prices, dates, policies, statistics, schedules, company claims, and technical details. 3. Use strong independent secondary sources for comparison, interpretation, or real-world context when they add value. 4. Do not rely on multiple pages that simply repeat the same underlying source as if they were independent confirmation. 5. For the most important claims, cross-check against another independent reliable source when practical. FRESHNESS Check publication and update dates. Make sure each time-sensitive claim matches the period I asked about. If an older source remains authoritative, explain why it is still relevant. VERIFICATION Recheck names, dates, prices, percentages, measurements, versions, deadlines, quotations, and calculations. Open cited sources and make sure they actually support the claim. Do not invent missing facts, citations, studies, or quotes. DISAGREEMENT AND UNCERTAINTY If trustworthy sources disagree, show the disagreement. Separate confirmed facts, reasonable inference, and unresolved uncertainty. Tell me what evidence is missing instead of guessing. OUTPUT Give me: 1. A concise answer or conclusion first. 2. A comparison or evidence table when useful. 3. The strongest evidence for each important point. 4. Key trade-offs, limitations, and exceptions. 5. Sources next to the claims they support. 6. A section called “What Still Needs Verification.” MY QUESTION [PASTE THE ACTUAL RESEARCH QUESTION HERE] Read the guide	Praclane	2026-10-04
3	General	Accurate, verifiable answers GOAL Help me accomplish this objective: [DESCRIBE THE RESULT YOU NEED]. CONTEXT Relevant background: [ADD CONTEXT, LOCATION, DATE RANGE, AUDIENCE, BUDGET, CONSTRAINTS, OR SOURCE MATERIAL]. ACCURACY AND SEARCH RULES 1. First determine whether this request depends on current, changing, external, or location-specific information. If it does, search the web before answering. If it does not, do not search unnecessarily. 2. Prefer official, primary, or first-party sources for rules, prices, product features, policies, statistics, schedules, laws, research, and other factual claims whenever practical. 3. Use secondary sources when they add useful explanation, comparison, or independent confirmation. 4. For important claims, cross-check with another independent reliable source when practical. 5. Check publication or update dates and make sure the evidence matches the time period and population I asked about. 6. Recheck names, dates, prices, percentages, measurements, version numbers, deadlines, quotes, and calculations before presenting them. 7. Do not invent missing information, citations, quotations, studies, features, or sources. REASONING AND UNCERTAINTY Separate: (a) confirmed facts, (b) reasonable inference, and (c) unresolved uncertainty. If trustworthy sources disagree, explain the disagreement and do not force a single conclusion. If the evidence is insufficient, say what is missing. ANSWER QUALITY Focus on my actual decision or goal instead of giving a generic overview. Prioritize the most useful information. Explain important trade-offs, limitations, exceptions, and risks. Ask a clarifying question only when missing information would materially change the answer. OUTPUT Give me: 1. A concise answer first. 2. The key evidence or reasoning. 3. A practical recommendation or next step when appropriate. 4. Sources next to the claims they support when web research is used. 5. A final section called “Verify Before Acting” listing any facts I should independently confirm because they are high-impact, uncertain, or likely to change. MY REQUEST [PASTE YOUR ACTUAL QUESTION OR TASK HERE] Read the guide	Praclane	2026-10-04
2	Planning	A realistic step-by-step plan GOAL I want to achieve: [GOAL]. DEFINITION OF DONE I will consider this complete when: [SPECIFIC OUTCOME]. CONTEXT Current situation: [WHERE I AM NOW]. Deadline or target date: [DATE]. Time available: [HOURS / DAYS / WEEK]. Budget/resources: [BUDGET / TOOLS / PEOPLE]. Constraints: [LIMITS, RULES, MUST-HAVES, MUST-NOT-HAVES]. PLANNING RULES 1. Do not jump straight to a generic task list. First identify missing information that would materially change the plan. 2. Break the goal into phases, then break each phase into concrete actions. 3. Show dependencies: which tasks must happen before others can start. 4. Separate Must Do, Should Do, and Optional tasks. 5. Estimate effort or time ranges when reasonable, but clearly label estimates. 6. Identify the biggest risks, bottlenecks, and assumptions. 7. If a task depends on current rules, prices, schedules, availability, or external facts, tell me what must be verified rather than guessing. 8. Keep the plan realistic for the time and resources I gave you. 9. Do not overload the first week or first phase. Prioritize the highest-leverage actions. OUTPUT Give me: 1. A one-paragraph plan summary. 2. A phased roadmap. 3. A table with Task, Priority, Dependency, Effort, Deadline, and Status. 4. The three biggest risks and how to reduce them. 5. Milestones or checkpoints where I should reassess the plan. 6. The next three actions I should take now. 7. A “Verify Before Acting” section for anything uncertain or time-sensitive. MY GOAL [PASTE THE ACTUAL GOAL HERE] Read the guide	Praclane	2026-10-03
1	Comparison	Fair comparisons between options DECISION I need to compare: [OPTION A], [OPTION B], [OPTION C]. My actual goal is: [WHAT I AM TRYING TO CHOOSE OR ACCOMPLISH]. CONTEXT My location/region: [REGION]. Budget or limits: [BUDGET / CONSTRAINTS]. My priorities, in order: [CRITERIA]. Deal-breakers: [MUST-HAVE / MUST-NOT-HAVE]. COMPARISON RULES 1. Use the same evaluation criteria for every option. 2. If information may have changed, search the web before comparing it. 3. Prefer official or first-party sources for specifications, included features, pricing, policies, limits, availability, and warranty/terms. 4. Use independent sources for real-world observations such as usability, reliability, comfort, or support quality when useful. 5. Separate verified facts from reviewer opinion, user anecdotes, and your own inference. 6. Check that model names, plan tiers, regions, dates, and versions actually match. 7. Do not fill missing information with guesses. Mark it as Not Verified. 8. If sources disagree, show the disagreement. SCORING Do not invent an overall score unless I explicitly ask for one. Compare the options criterion by criterion. Show trade-offs rather than forcing a winner. OUTPUT Give me: 1. A short summary of the meaningful differences. 2. One comparison table using the same criteria for every option. 3. The strongest fit for each type of user or situation, without pretending one option is best for everyone. 4. Important trade-offs, hidden costs, limits, and uncertainties. 5. Source links beside time-sensitive or factual claims. 6. A “Verify Before Buying/Choosing” section for anything likely to change. OPTIONS TO COMPARE [PASTE OPTIONS OR LINKS HERE] Read the guide	Praclane	2026-10-02

Share your own prompt

Send a title, category, use case, and the full prompt through our contact page. Include an example result if helpful. We review submissions before adding them to the collection.

Share content you have permission to publish and remove private information. Published prompts are available for visitors to copy and adapt.

For step-by-step tutorials and explanations, visit our blog.